From lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au Sat Nov 3 11:50:19 2007 From: lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au (Lev Lafayette) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition Message-ID: <894111.50563.qm@web33506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Well, I finally found and purchased a copy... The seller issued caution however; apparently the otherwise excellent condition was somewhat marred by "minor writing in the front cover". The missive is: "Brian - May you always make successful Spot Hidden rolls. Steve Perrin" Now to carefully go through it and see what the differences are between first and second edition :-) Just had to share, Lev __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From stephenlposey at earthlink.net Sat Nov 3 16:26:40 2007 From: stephenlposey at earthlink.net (Stephen Posey) Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:26:40 -0600 Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition In-Reply-To: <894111.50563.qm@web33506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <894111.50563.qm@web33506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <472C0690.9030602@earthlink.net> Lev Lafayette wrote: > Well, I finally found and purchased a copy... > > The seller issued caution however; apparently the > otherwise excellent condition was somewhat marred by > "minor writing in the front cover". > > The missive is: > > "Brian - May you always make successful Spot Hidden > rolls. Steve Perrin" > > Now to carefully go through it and see what the > differences are between first and second edition :-) > > Just had to share, You have a signed copy of RQ1 as "marred by writing"? Some people have all the luck :-/ Stephen Posey stephenlposey at earthlink.net From josephnjody at sbcglobal.net Sun Nov 4 07:26:56 2007 From: josephnjody at sbcglobal.net (Joseph Paul) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 15:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition In-Reply-To: <894111.50563.qm@web33506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I have been told, and I would like to see confirmation, that the magic had no stacking limits. Joseph Paul -----Original Message----- From: rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com [mailto:rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com]On Behalf Of Lev Lafayette Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:50 PM To: Discussion of RuneQuest rules. Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition Well, I finally found and purchased a copy... The seller issued caution however; apparently the otherwise excellent condition was somewhat marred by "minor writing in the front cover". The missive is: "Brian - May you always make successful Spot Hidden rolls. Steve Perrin" Now to carefully go through it and see what the differences are between first and second edition :-) Just had to share, Lev __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ RQ-Rules mailing list RQ-Rules at crashbox.com http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules From lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au Sun Nov 4 10:10:57 2007 From: lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au (Lev Lafayette) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 16:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <515961.15002.qm@web33511.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Spells cannot be stacked to gain extra effect (two Bladesharp 2's does not equal a Bladesharp 4), but they can be stacked to punch through Countermagic and they like - they just have the same effect as the minimum Power to cast the spell (p41). In other words, the same as p33 of the RQ II rules. Not sure about Rune spells, haven't read up on that yet... All the best, Lev --- Joseph Paul wrote: > I have been told, and I would like to see > confirmation, that the magic had > no stacking limits. > > Joseph Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com > [mailto:rq-rules-bounces at crashbox.com]On Behalf Of > Lev Lafayette > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:50 PM > To: Discussion of RuneQuest rules. > Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition > > > > Well, I finally found and purchased a copy... > > The seller issued caution however; apparently the > otherwise excellent condition was somewhat marred by > "minor writing in the front cover". > > The missive is: > > "Brian - May you always make successful Spot Hidden > rolls. Steve Perrin" > > Now to carefully go through it and see what the > differences are between first and second edition :-) > > Just had to share, > > > > Lev > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > RQ-Rules mailing list > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com > http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules > > _______________________________________________ > RQ-Rules mailing list > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com > http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From aescleal at btinternet.com Sun Nov 4 18:17:22 2007 From: aescleal at btinternet.com (Ashley Munday) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 07:17:22 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Rq-rules] RuneQuest 1st edition In-Reply-To: <894111.50563.qm@web33506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <605871.42050.qm@web86102.mail.ird.yahoo.com> I love it: "Mona Lisa, marred by artists signature." Cheers, Ash --- Lev Lafayette wrote: > > Well, I finally found and purchased a copy... > > The seller issued caution however; apparently the > otherwise excellent condition was somewhat marred by > "minor writing in the front cover". > > The missive is: > > "Brian - May you always make successful Spot Hidden > rolls. Steve Perrin" > > Now to carefully go through it and see what the > differences are between first and second edition :-) > > Just had to share, > > > > Lev > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > RQ-Rules mailing list > RQ-Rules at crashbox.com > http://crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules > From lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au Sun Nov 18 21:58:10 2007 From: lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au (Lev Lafayette) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:58:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Rq-rules] Classic RuneQuest: How Would You Do It? Message-ID: <624297.59330.qm@web33504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> A wee bit off-topic for a group dedicated to the rules, but given the brains present... If you were to run classic RuneQuest (i.e., the Borderlands, Pavis and Big Rubble boxed sets) in a campaign for people who are experienced roleplayers and have some RQ experience, in what order would you do it? At the moment, I am thinking doing all or most of the Borderlands scenarios in succession then moving into Pavis and alternating between the Pavis and Big Rubble scenarios. Obviously the Cradles scenario comes last because, well, that is so epic.. What say ye? Lev ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs