<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1108892246;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-553750912 201916433 201916441 201916443 201916431 201916441 201916443 201916431 201916441 201916443;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-text:"%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-AU link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Just GM’d my 1<sup>st</sup> MRQ2 game on Thursday. All had been RQ2 players 20-30 years ago. The three players fought 4 scout dragonewts and then 3 sets of three trollkin. Sartar Companion & Jorthan’s Rescue White Dwarf 14. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>They each had about 65-70% in their weapon skills and their opponents 50%. I made plenty of mistakes, but this particular forum will help tremendously, next session.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Preliminary comments I would make from this session are:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>1)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I suggested they all should have 13 Cha and be able to get 3CA (Character Action). Seems too obvious…they agreed. Can anybody remember 3e D&D Haste Spell…<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>2)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I await the sorcerer realising about Enhance DEX and that ‘enhance’ CA spell I have seen somewhere…<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>3)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Then maybe he will realise about the 3x spell casting a round, and use Diminish Dex, Dull Blade etc etc<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>4)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>The fights went quickly, monsters died if not in the first round the second. 5 second rounds are too short. The Dragonewts had 2 CA’s and afterwards none of my monsters will have 2CA’s again.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>5)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>The Trollkin 3CA’s and low AP’s. They would miss a parry and lose a limb, but each group in turn were butchered. Both players and monsters had 1-3 AP in locations.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>6)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I noted that non-tool/weapon using creatures do not have a dodge skill so they can never ‘parry’- does an animal Combat Style, say claw, provide a Parry? The issue is, say, I get a bear to rush the party of 9 CA’s. Its 2 CA’s get counted with 2 Parry’s and then it would get butcherd with 7CA + bonus manoeuvres in the round.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>7)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Sorcerers’ just flick thru for the Grimoire with the most and suitable spells, my PC choose Esvular and St Volanc. Should it be that you can only choose 1 ‘cult’ Grimoire ever? Then ALL others are just a 4 spell ‘skill’/Grimoire.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>8)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Start skills seem to be quite high – it would seem than MRQ2 sweet spot is 60-90%, where as RQ2 was 50-70%, for Combat Skills – OK maybe TOO early to say this.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>9)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Common Magic was suggested (and accepted) and chosen to always be 60+POW+Cha. Trouble with this is that Persistence can only be 30+POWx2 at setup. Learn befuddle and cast it 3x a round requiring an Opposed test, the caster ‘holding’ a 30% bonus… The players are yet to realise this.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>10)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Spending +30% Prior Experience on Cbt Style/Common Magic/Resistance/Persistence/Evade/Grimoire seems to be no brainer.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>11)<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>1 player crit’d a failed parry, and took off a trollkin head – Ignore Armour, Choose Location, Max Damage – can you choose 2 crit manoeuvres with a crit? This is why we all like the realism of RQ, but at the end of the day, the GM will make many more potential strikes against the players than the players will make against the monsters – albeit you have hero points.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>At the end of the first evening, all I can say is the combats went fast and were brutal. This was good for pacing the roleplaying and action. Will continue to Play As Written.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Next session opponents will have the slightly higher skilled opponents, more AP and far better tactics…will see. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>My gut feeling is we will eventually return to RQ2 1 Attack 1 Parry (skipping CA altogether).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>After next session may consider giving free extra parries (once out of CA’s) at -20%, -30%, -40% etc etc & a Combat Style ‘Dodge’ (Different from Evade) to non-tool/weapon using creatures.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Sean<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> runequest-bounces@rpgreview.net [mailto:runequest-bounces@rpgreview.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>grogthing<br><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, 20 August 2011 10:33 PM<br><b>To:</b> RuneQuest Rules<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Runequest] MRQ II - Combat<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>I think your interpretation is wrong .. trying to justify the broken CA system.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>The problem is basing actions directly off of the attribute, without considering training.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Your treating agility/speed as a one separate skill ... and you fighting skill percentage as just accuracy.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>You may not have natural quickness but after years of training .. in a particular skill ... develop very fast reflexes in that skill.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Before I started martial arts .... my hand eye coordination was poor ... my reflexes slow.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>After years of practice, I have very quick hands. At striking and blocking. But I still suck at playing guitar. I am not faster in everything I do, so it is not my general agility attribute going up, but my overall martial arts strike skill including its speed that has gone up.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Attributes are natural ability .. training then adds to natural ability ... you add together to get total skill % and overall effectiveness.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>A person with skill 80% is a better total fighter than a 60%. Faster and more skilled. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>They may have started both at a base level of ability based on natural aptitude, one of them may have had 2 more points in agility at the beginning of training, which gave him a distinct advantage in the beginning, but after years of training .. the naturally slower guy puts in more effort training to get to 80% ... then he is better than the naturally faster guy trained only to 60% .. the skill percentage is total aptitude ... too much weight has been given in MRQII to attribute, ignoring training.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>they could have done something like ca = base of 1 + 1 for every 5 agility over 10 + 1 for every full 25% of skill .. calculate for each combat skill.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>That would take into effect greater training.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Just my take.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Gregory<o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><hr size=1 width="100%" align=center></span></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> Bruce Mason <<a href="mailto:mason.bruce@gmail.com">mason.bruce@gmail.com</a>><br><b>To:</b> RuneQuest Rules <<a href="mailto:runequest@rpgreview.net">runequest@rpgreview.net</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, August 20, 2011 7:55 AM<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Runequest] MRQ II - Combat</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><div id=yiv1449620689><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>I think what this shows is that you are slow and not too bright then you really ought not to be on a battlefield. If you're constantly being beaten down in training by people who don't seem to be as skilful as you, then work on your fitness because that's your weakness. It's saying that if you don't have a certain minimum level of physical ability then you are at a disadvantage and it takes a lot of skill to overcome that.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>Another way to look at it is this:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>If your skill is 60% then 3 of out of every 5 CAs are effective. If your skill is 80% then 4 out of every 5 CAs are effective. In a situation where you have 4 CAs per round and your skill is 60% then you can expect 2 or 3 of them to work each round. If your skill is 80% and you have 3 CAs then 2 or 3 of them will be effective. On average the difference is not as extreme as you might think. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>Look also at 120% vs 100%. Due to the over 100% rule that equates to 80 vs 100.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>80% and 4 CAs is 3 or 4 successes. 100% with 3 CAs is close to guaranteed 3 CAs. In this case the skill effect is probably greater. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>I'm not personally a fan of variable CAs but I don't think there's anything wrong with the "math" or that somewhere out there there is "better math".<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>On 20 August 2011 12:51, Trevor Ellis <<a href="mailto:trevor.ellis@pobox.com" target="_blank">trevor.ellis@pobox.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>I love the concept of the MRQ II Combat rules - I just think that they got<br>the math a little wrong. So, as Lawrence suggested, I tried it a few times.<br><br>Fast Fred (3 CA + all skills at 60%) vs Slow Sam (2 CA + all skills at 80%)<br>- each gets a +1 CA for the Shield, each has Longsword & Heater Shield, 1d4<br>db, and 3pt armour. Fred won the Initiative.<br><br>ROUND 1<br><br>1.1 Fred attacks Sam Parries. Fred rolls 03 critical Sam rolls 54 Success.<br>Fred's damage is blocked but his obvious choice for manoeuvre is Disarm<br>[this is 92% certain to succeed because Sam needs a critical from 80% to<br>beat the original attack roll]. Sam rolls 23 - he has dropped his sword.<br>Sam now has a problem - pick it up and receive two free hits whilst doing so<br>or continue to parry and receive 1 free hit. F=3CA S=2CA left.<br>1.2: Sam picks up and readies his sword - Sam has no CA left. Fred is now<br>hoping for a critical in his next attacks (3 * 6%). F=3CA S=0CA left.<br>1.3: Fred attacks - 34% success. 5 damage (2 through) to Sam's left leg -<br>manoeuvre is Bleed Sam resist roll of 79% succeeds F=2CA S=0CA left.<br>1.4: Fred attacks - 56% success. Manoeuvre Choose Location (left Leg) 7<br>damage (4 through) Sam is on the ground. Sam rolls 65% Resilience and stays<br>standing, but for stunned rolls 2 rounds in which he cannot attack CA. F=1CA<br>S=0CA left.<br>1.5: Fred attacks (0 CA left) - 87% fail. F=0CA S=0CA left.<br><br>Note Sam has dropped his weapon, picked it up, has a leg on -1, and is<br>stunned (no attack) for 2 CA. BTW this is a heck of a lot to happen in 5<br>seconds.<br><br>ROUND 2<br>2.1: Fred attacks & Sam parries - both fail so no effect. F=3CA S=2CA left.<br>2.2: Sam tries to heal his leg - 49% for 2 points. F=3CA S=1CA left.<br>2.3: Fred attacks & Sam parries - both succeed. F=2CA S=0CA left.<br>2.4: Fred attacks 37% Manoeuvre = Bleed - 7 pt damage to Sam's Chest (4<br>through). Sam 58% Resists. F=1CA S=0CA left.<br>2.5: Fred attacks 57% Manoeuvre = Choose Location. 8 pt damage to Sam's<br>Chest (5 through). F=0CA S=0CA left. Chest is negative Sam fails his<br>opposed Resilience 42% and so is unconscious.<br><br>I have run this combat 6 times Fred won 4 and Sam won 2. Had it been a<br>group of 3 Freds vs a group of 3 Sams then, I believe, the Freds would win<br>EVERY time. So, if offered a choice between "CA=3 + 60% in every skill" or<br>"CA=2 + 80% in every skill" I know which I'd choose. Strangely, when I<br>tried a couple of combats with 2h Spear Fred seemed to do better when he<br>lost the Initiative roll.<br><br>IMO the problem is the all-or-nothing/sudden death nature. If both succeed<br>then absolutely nothing happens, if attack succeeds by one step or more then<br>it gets damage plus a manoeuvre. With critical at 10% of skill this happens<br>more than RQ2. Until Resilience etc is built up to a high-level the<br>manoeuvre outcome can be really dangerous. The first person to get a<br>one-step attack success will probably go on to win the fight - unless the<br>skill levels are really very, very different.<br><br>It is the scale of the affect that I have problems with - try a RQ2 battle<br>with 60%/80% skills and only the 60% with a 1d4 damage bonus and you'll see<br>what I mean.<br><br>Unless anyone has MRQ II house rules with a better math.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'><br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Runequest mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Runequest@rpgreview.net" target="_blank">Runequest@rpgreview.net</a><br><a href="http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net" target="_blank">http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><span style='color:black'><br>_______________________________________________<br>Runequest mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Runequest@rpgreview.net">Runequest@rpgreview.net</a><br><a href="http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net" target="_blank">http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net</a><br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>