<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
As long as it gets a nice, unambiguous name like <EM>BASIC OPEN RUNEQUEST: Mongoose Slayers and their Roleplaying Adventures in Glorantha, </EM>I'll be fine with it.<BR>
<BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:09:09 +0100<BR>From: snarks@gmail.com<BR>To: runequest@rpgreview.net<BR>Subject: Re: [Runequest] Latest on RQ rights<BR><BR>Tony Den:<BR>>So, any news on what the future of RuneQuest (name and system) holds? Has<BR>>Issaries found someone else to rewrite and publish RuneQuest again?<BR><BR>I think Mongoose still hold the licence until the end of this year. I wouldn't expect any announcements before then, even if a deal is struck with another company. But if Mongoose couldn't make a go of Second Age Glorantha, who else would pick it up and give it the resources that it needs?<BR><BR>Phil Hibbs.<BR>-- <BR clear=all>Don't you just hate self-referential sigs?<BR><BR>_______________________________________________ Runequest mailing list Runequest@rpgreview.net http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net </body>
</html>