<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
And speaking of which - review of RQ2 on RPG.net today (guess which one!).<BR>
<BR>
<A href="http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/14/14573.phtml">http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/14/14573.phtml</A><BR>
<BR> <BR>> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:11:22 +1030<BR>> From: dtl@internode.on.net<BR>> To: runequest@rpgreview.net<BR>> Subject: Re: [Runequest] Mongoose to release a new version of RQ II<BR>> <BR>> Gary Sturgess wrote:<BR>> > Thing is: if RQ2 were still in print, then this would bother me a lot<BR>> > more. But not only isn't this the case, it isn't even the most recent<BR>> > "old school" version to go out of print. Now, Mongoose do have some<BR>> > crimes to answer for - their apparent refusal to credit playtesters<BR>> > and the original authors (though this is something D&D4e did as well -<BR>> > a possible trend) - but in the end they put out a version of RuneQuest<BR>> > for the 21st century, and way before Chaosium managed to get BRP out.<BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> My comments have nothing to do with any crimes Mongoose may or may have <BR>> not committed.<BR>> <BR>> In the here and now, if a person does a search for "review runequest 2", <BR>> they will be confused when they find a review for RQ2 on RPG.net.<BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Runequest mailing list<BR>> Runequest@rpgreview.net<BR>> http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net<BR> </body>
</html>