[Runequest] Flexible and hard armor together.
pmaranci at gmail.com
Tue Apr 9 00:32:05 EST 2013
There was also a similar museum in Thun, Switzerland - but I imagine that
there are places like that all over Europe. It was neat finding one in
America, though. I got some cool photos, including one of a gun shield -
i.e. a shield with a gun built into it - and a sword that was built into a
The collection will be moved, but the place itself is magical. And we don't
know how much of the collection will be displayed at the place.
Needless to say, we're going to go back there as often as possible until
they close! The stuff I learned there will definitely enhance my campaign.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Styopa <styopa1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's a great reference Peter - http://www.higgins.org/history-museum -
> it's a bloody shame they're closing. I wish I'd known it was there. I may
> be on a biz trip to the Springfield area by the end of April, and since
> I'll have to drive from Boston to Springfield, I wonder if I can finagle my
> schedule to block out a few hours.....hmmm.
> For those similarly interested who might be in the Vienna (Austria) area a
> must-see is the Kunsthistorisches Museum Hofjagd-und Ruestkammer in the
> Neue Burg -
> http://www.khm.at/en/visit/collections/collection-of-arms-and-armour/?cHash=dfb045333efd096a1ea1afd262c4a608 pictures
> of some selected items at
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Peter Maranci <pmaranci at gmail.com> wrote:
>> By an odd coincidence I was just at the truly amazing Higgins Armory in
>> Worcester, Massachusetts this weekend. It's a museum of medieval armor and
>> weapons (which tragically is going to close forever at the end of 2013).
>> And this very question came up at a demonstration.
>> Chainmail under plate was not practical due to weight considerations and
>> bulk. Patches of chain were used at certain strategic locations in many
>> suits of armor, where plate wasn't used for reasons such as mobility.
>> I learned a lot there. For example, I didn't know that a full suit of
>> combat plate could weigh as little as 30 pounds, and that a fully-armored
>> knight once did a triple somersault in midair! The suits that took forever
>> to put on and weighed a ridiculous amount were specifically for jousting -
>> which was, of course, a very limited activity with strict rules.
>> If you can possibly get to the Armory before they close, it's well worth
>> seeing. My son and his friend LOVED the place; they're both eleven. My wife
>> and I found it fascinating, too! Here's a link to a photosphere I took of
>> the third and fourth floors:
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Styopa <styopa1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I spent a lot of time kludging house rules as to what could be layered,
>>> and what couldn't, and finally ultimately agreed with how it's written (I'm
>>> pretty sure) in the RQ6 rules: you simply can't.
>>> Armor is actually a fairly complex system, that has to be flexible in
>>> some places and inflexible in others for it to work. I'm going to go with
>>> the idea that armorers knew their business, and designed the armor for the
>>> best level of protection possible while not inordinately hindering the
>>> wearer at a given level of protection.
>>> If someone INSISTS on wearing a 'heavy leather poncho' over their plate
>>> armor or something, or trying to stuff a layer of chain/whatever under
>>> plate armor, sure, give them another 1-2 points of protection but I'd
>>> probably penalize physical activities - ie combat - a level of difficulty
>>> per extra point of protection. Sure, you can mummify yourself in bubble
>>> wrap if you want, and you'll be safer...of course, you won't be able to
>>> move, but you will on the simplest level resist blows better.
>>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Steve Perrin <steve.perrin at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> You keep layering armor and you are going to look like the Michelin
>>>> Man. I don't think I would give a plate and chain combination more than 1
>>>> extra point of armor. I would also be watching fatigue penalties very
>>>> Actually, since I hate keeping track of that kind of stuff, I just
>>>> would not allow it.
>>>> Steve Perrin
>>>> On 4/7/2013 10:01 PM, Asher Royce Yaffee wrote:
>>>> Hi, All,
>>>> Cheapskate that I am (and given pay cuts and how much more my kids
>>>> eat every passing year....), I still haven't bought RQ6 yet -- though I
>>>> want to. In the meantime, my beat up old RQ3 books still soldier on.
>>>> Hopefully the books'll survive one more summer of gaming with my kids. :-)
>>>> Wait! There's a point to this email.
>>>> The RQ3 rule that allows flexible armor under rigid armor. It makes
>>>> obvious sense for cases of cloth or leather under plate. But was it
>>>> intended to include chain mail under plate mail?
>>>> If so, then that's a lot of armor points. So, I wanted to ask if
>>>> the game designers originally intended rich characters to have 15 armor
>>>> points (in addition to any magical protection).
>>>> Also, I am very interested in the opinions of people who have fought
>>>> in armor. What do you think makes the most sense?
>>>> Wisdom and experience and guidance are warmly welcome.
>>>> Runequest mailing listRunequest at rpgreview.nethttp://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net
>>>> Runequest mailing list
>>>> Runequest at rpgreview.net
>>> Runequest mailing list
>>> Runequest at rpgreview.net
>> Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
>> Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
>> The Diary of A Simple Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
>> Runequest mailing list
>> Runequest at rpgreview.net
> Runequest mailing list
> Runequest at rpgreview.net
Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
The Diary of A Simple Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Runequest