[Runequest] Latest on RQ rights

strobus at sympatico.ca strobus at sympatico.ca
Thu Jun 9 00:42:44 EST 2011

As long as it gets a nice, unambiguous name like BASIC OPEN RUNEQUEST: Mongoose Slayers and their Roleplaying Adventures in Glorantha, I'll be fine with it.

Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:09:09 +0100
From: snarks at gmail.com
To: runequest at rpgreview.net
Subject: Re: [Runequest] Latest on RQ rights

Tony Den:
>So, any news on what the future of RuneQuest (name and system) holds? Has
>Issaries found someone else to rewrite and publish RuneQuest again?

I think Mongoose still hold the licence until the end of this year. I wouldn't expect any announcements before then, even if a deal is struck with another company. But if Mongoose couldn't make a go of Second Age Glorantha, who else would pick it up and give it the resources that it needs?

Phil Hibbs.
-- Don't you just hate self-referential sigs?

_______________________________________________ Runequest mailing list Runequest at rpgreview.net http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/runequest_rpgreview.net/attachments/20110608/f225ba5a/attachment.html>

More information about the Runequest mailing list