[Runequest] Latest on RQ rights

Sean Foster ebaninth at iinet.net.au
Thu Jun 9 00:39:20 EST 2011

Can anybody comment on the "RQ System"  Is the new Peter/Loz System owned by
Mongoose (To be called "wayfarer" or some such).  Is the whole Attack/Parry
Mongoose's now or can someone build on it after December?


It would be great if Paizo or Fantasy Flight would have a go.it would be
good to try quality (art etc etc) rather than the (acceptable business
practice of) publish or perish employed by Mongoose.




From: runequest-bounces at rpgreview.net
[mailto:runequest-bounces at rpgreview.net] On Behalf Of Phil Hibbs
Sent: Wednesday, 8 June 2011 10:09 PM
To: RuneQuest Rules
Subject: Re: [Runequest] Latest on RQ rights


Tony Den:
>So, any news on what the future of RuneQuest (name and system) holds? Has
>Issaries found someone else to rewrite and publish RuneQuest again?

I think Mongoose still hold the licence until the end of this year. I
wouldn't expect any announcements before then, even if a deal is struck with
another company. But if Mongoose couldn't make a go of Second Age Glorantha,
who else would pick it up and give it the resources that it needs?

Phil Hibbs.
Don't you just hate self-referential sigs?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/runequest_rpgreview.net/attachments/20110608/1f501e9b/attachment.html>

More information about the Runequest mailing list