[Runequest] MRQ2 - Any good?

Peter Maranci pmaranci at gmail.com
Sat Jan 29 00:27:35 EST 2011


So the new version is a more *accurate* theft of RuneQuest, then? :D

->Peter

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Lev Lafayette <lev at rpgreview.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:37 +0000, Bruce Mason wrote:
> > I think this has been answered before but I can summarise my opinions.
> >
> > In spirit it's closer to RQ2 than to RQ3. Which is to say that there's
> > an attempt to prioritise game fun over simulation.
>
> I actually think MRQ2 is a lot closer to RQ3. MRQ1 tried to emulate RQ2,
> but, for various reasons, didn't quite cut the grade.
>
> One of the things I obviously like about it is that the seemed to go
> through a checklist of all the things I complained about MRQ in my
> review on rpg.net and followed my advice almost to the letter :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Runequest mailing list
> Runequest at rpgreview.net
> http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net
>

-- 
Peter Maranci - pmaranci at gmail.com
Pete's RuneQuest & Roleplaying! http://www.runequest.org/rq.htm
The Diary of A Simple Man: http://bobquasit.livejournal.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/runequest_rpgreview.net/attachments/20110128/0c8e81af/attachment.html>


More information about the Runequest mailing list