[Runequest] Hard versus soft armor.
lev at rpgreview.net
Wed Jan 13 12:58:06 EST 2010
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:53 -0800, royce at efn.org wrote:
> Hi, Again,
> I'd forgotten all about the errata to the AH deluxe edition. Thank you
> for reminding me.
It contains *very* important rules!
> And, if
> chainmail is "soft", then "ringmail" should be, as well, right?
Yes, ringmail is soft. Rings on soft leather.
AKA studded leather. Soft.
Soft again. Although the individual pieces are hard, the armour itself
is flexible and has soft backing.
Like lamellar but even more flexible. No backing armour.
Cloth plus riveted plates. Again flexible.
> I lack the experience to say.
So do I, so I welcome any corrections to the above :)
More information about the Runequest