[Runequest] List description

[Tomas Björklund]

Agreed.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Lev Lafayette <lev_lafayette at yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>
> --- Nick.Middleton at wrsl.com wrote:
>
>
> ...
>
> > In general my assessment would be that this list has
> > always discussed the
> > RQ family of derived games, but with the emphasis
> > firmly on the rules, and
> > mostly focused on RQII/III. That remit quite clearly
> > DOES include the new
> > BRP (as, with the right options selected, it is a
> > near carbon copy of
> > RQIII), and shouldn't be hostile to the odd mention
> > of other BRP related
> > RPG's _where their rules content is relevant_. MRQ
> > is (*grits teeth*)
> > clearly as on topic as the _rules_ of RQIV:AiG or
> > the new BRP; it's simply
> > another rule set directly "related" to RQII/III. But
> > Elric, Hawkmoon,
> > Slaine, Call of Cthulhu etc _as settings_ are off
> > topic (in the sense that
> > this ISN'T  a list about discussing settings, but
> > rules), but if their
> > _rules_ content is interesting, they clearly are.
> > Likewise Pete's Rome,
> > Jason's Interplanetary, Charles' Fracture Hopes or
> > Gwenthia are only
> > relevant in the context of rules discussion here.
>
>
> Nick has managed to express my feelings on the matter
> far better than I probably could have managed :-)
>
> All the best,
>
>
> Lev
>
> (PS: Only a few hiccups on the transfer, but I'll let
> you all know about it soon...)
>
>
>
>  ____________________________________________________________________________________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster
> Total Access, No Cost.
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Runequest mailing list
> Runequest at rpgreview.net
> http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/runequest_rpgreview.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/runequest_rpgreview.net/attachments/20080402/f5b701c3/attachment.htm>