[RQ-Rules] Bastard Sword Damage

[David Smart]

Keep in mind that there is a different STR requirement when wielding a bastard sword one-handed and a penalty if a character doesn't have the minimum required STR a weapon calls for.

David Smart

-------Original Message-------
From: Nick.Middleton at invensys.com
Sent: 04/29/03 03:44 AM
To: rq-rules at crashbox.com
Subject: Re: [RQ-Rules] Bastard Sword Damage

"Bastard" or "Hand and half swords" were common in  a number of era's. My
old re-enactment one is still hanging in the hall (sans hilt furniture
alas, keeping company with the crocodile head and my longbow...) and it
was
easily wielded one-handed. Hand and a half swords had extended hilts to
allow a two-handed grip _when necessary_ if the sword _required_ two hands
to wield effectively then it's a two-handed sword IMO.

I seem to re-call a rule (RQII? Optional RQII rule?) that wielded
one-handed a bastard sword indeed only did 1d8+1 which is one option.
Another might be to adjust the SR rating (one handed is less controllable
so increase the weapon SR?), or perhaps wielded one-handed there should be
no damage bonus allowed? My personal instinct would be to reduce the sword
damage as you suggest: the sword still has it's reach and is perfectly
usable one-handed (allowing use of a shielded) but this is traded off
against better damage from wielding it fully two-handed.

However this is a compromise: on Wars of the Roses re-enactment
battlefields my (limited) sword experience was that the _most_ effective
use of a bastard sword involved frequent switching between one and two
handed use (Pole arm users always look startled when you pull them in by
grabbing the haft of their weapon with your off hand: the lesson is never
bring a pole arm to a one on one duel unless you are _very_ good). And
switching round by round between one and two-handed grips precludes using
a
shield (other than something small like a buckler).

I have a copy of the RQ II game aids at home and I'm sure one and two
handed bastard swords get separate entries. If no-one else can confirm it
I'll try and look tonight...

Cheers,

Nick Middleton


_______________________________________________
RQ-Rules mailing list
RQ-Rules at crashbox.com
<a target=_blank
href="http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules">http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules</a>
<a target=_blank
href="http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules">http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules</a>
>