[Churchofgaming] Fw: Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6 (Dark Heresy late November)

Tue Nov 15 02:55:56 UTC 2011

I thought DH was supposed to be when Planescape was on? You've got that game - we (leftovers) get the DH!

...and now the rats wanna jump ship :)

>
>
>From: Carl Brown <catodon at whale-mail.com>
>>To: churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
>>Sent: Monday, 14 November 2011, 21:25
>>Subject: Re: [Churchofgaming] Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6 (Dark Heresy late November)
>>
>>
>>The 27th is a Planescape date so me and Liz are out.
>>Another game is desperately needed for Planescape days and 40k is a great universe.
>>Battletech is currently just something we play as a one off. I'm trying to learn the game to one day run an integrated rpg/wargame campaign but I imagine it will be a very long time before I'm ready for that, a year maybe.
>>
>>I still believe we can support two groups and therefore as many as 4 games.
>>
>><-----Original Message-----> 
>>>From: Redmond Hamlett [redmond.hamlett at gmail.com]
>>>Sent: 11/14/2011 12:50:42 PM
>>>To: churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
>>>Subject: Re: [Churchofgaming] Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40,Issue 6 (Dark Heresy
>>>late November)
>>>
>>><div> </div>
>>><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <span
>>>dir="ltr"><<a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming-request at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming-request at rpgreview.net</a>></span>
>>>wrote:<br>
>>><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px
>>>0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send Churchofgaming mailing list submissions
>>>to<br> <a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming at rpgreview.net</a><br>
>>><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a
>>>href="http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net"
>>>target="_blank">http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net</a><br>
>>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> 
>>> <a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming-request at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming-request at rpgreview.net</a><br><br>You
>>>can reach the person managing the list at<br>
>>> <a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming-owner at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming-owner at rpgreview.net</a><br><br>When
>>>replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re:
>>>Contents of Churchofgaming digest..."<br>
>>><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Battletech today (Carl Brown)<br> 2.
>>>Anarchy in Poland (was Re: Battletech today) (<a
>>>href="mailto:lev at rpgreview.net">lev at rpgreview.net</a>)<br> 3. Re: Anarchy in
>>>Poland (was Re: Battletech today) (Michael Cole)<br>
>>><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message:
>>>1<br>Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:25:48 -0800<br>From: "Carl Brown"
>>><<a href="mailto:catodon at whale-mail.com">catodon at whale-mail.com</a>><br>
>>>To: <<a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming at rpgreview.net</a>><br>Subject:
>>>[Churchofgaming] Battletech today<br>Message-ID: <<a
>>>href="mailto:B754F4512C804B0D9C508E8A6192555D at mail2world.com">B754F4512C804B0D9C508E8A6192555D at mail2world.com</a>><br>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Battletech
>>>today.<br><br>100tons each.<br>3 people<br>1430-1750 (200min therefore ~20min
>>>per turn)<br>10 turns of combat.<br>Did not finish<br>>From playing megamek
>>>(look it up) it think we need 13 turns to finish.<br>
>>>Even starting promptly at 1400 would not be enough.<br>Next time I suggest a
>>>1400 start and 80 tons each<br>or<br>a 1430 start and 70 tons
>>>each<br>OR<br>Anyone want to run an RPG
>>>campaign?<br><br>K<br><br><br><br><br><p><p>Care2 makes it easy for
>>>everyone to live a healthy, green lifestyle<br>
>>>and impact the causes you care about most. Over 12 Million members!<br><a
>>>href="<a href="http://www.care2.com/"
>>>target="_blank">http://www.care2.com</a>" target=_blank><a
>>>href="http://www.care2.com/"
>>>target="_blank">http://www.care2.com</a></a><br /><br /><br>
>>>Feed a child by searching the web! Learn how <a href="<a
>>>href="http://www.care2.com/toolbar"
>>>target="_blank">http://www.care2.com/toolbar</a>" target=_blank><a
>>>href="http://www.care2.com/toolbar"
>>>target="_blank">http://www.care2.com/toolbar</a><a><br>
>>>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was
>>>scrubbed....<br>URL: <<a
>>>href="http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20111113/66305c6f/attachment-0001.html"
>>>target="_blank">http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20111113/66305c6f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
>>><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011
>>>09:25:10 +1100<br>From: <a
>>>href="mailto:lev at rpgreview.net">lev at rpgreview.net</a><br>To: "Church of
>>>Gaming" <<a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming at rpgreview.net</a>><br>
>>>Subject: [Churchofgaming] Anarchy in Poland (was Re: Battletech<br> 
>>> today)<br>Message-ID:<br> <<a
>>>href="mailto:6d3fbfe66f4115de7dbeba717333b7d2.squirrel at webmail.rpgreview.net">6d3fbfe66f4115de7dbeba717333b7d2.squirrel at webmail.rpgreview.net</a>><br>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1<br><br>> OR<br>> Anyone want
>>>to run an RPG campaign?<br><br>I have an itching to run a Twilight 2000 campaign
>>>(although probably using<br>more sensible rules like GURPS or even, for a really
>>>narrativist approach,<br>
>>>HeroQuest).<br><br>The interesting spin is that the PCs will be made up of both
>>>NATO and<br>Warsaw Pact members and will have a combined ideology :)<br><br>Plus
>>>something that's very special which both sides want to get their<br>
>>>hands on....<br><br>Who's
>>>interested?<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message:
>>>3<br>Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:56:43 -0800 (PST)<br>From: Michael Cole <<a
>>>href="mailto:mcole222 at yahoo.com.au">mcole222 at yahoo.com.au</a>><br>
>>>To: Church of Gaming <<a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming at rpgreview.net</a>><br>Subject:
>>>Re: [Churchofgaming] Anarchy in Poland (was Re: Battletech<br> 
>>> today)<br>Message-ID:<br> <<a
>>>href="mailto:1321228603.93304.YahooMailClassic at web160301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com">1321228603.93304.YahooMailClassic at web160301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com</a>><br>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8<br><br><br><br>--- On Mon, 14/11/11, <a
>>>href="mailto:lev at rpgreview.net">lev at rpgreview.net</a> <<a
>>>href="mailto:lev at rpgreview.net">lev at rpgreview.net</a>> wrote:<br><br>>
>>>From: <a href="mailto:lev at rpgreview.net">lev at rpgreview.net</a> <<a
>>>href="mailto:lev at rpgreview.net">lev at rpgreview.net</a>><br>
>>>> Subject: [Churchofgaming] Anarchy in Poland (was Re: Battletech
>>>today)<br>> To: "Church of Gaming" <<a
>>>href="mailto:churchofgaming at rpgreview.net">churchofgaming at rpgreview.net</a>><br>>
>>>Received: Monday, 14 November, 2011, 9:25 AM<br>
>>>> > OR<br>> > Anyone want to run an RPG campaign?<br>><br>> I
>>>have an itching to run a Twilight 2000 campaign (although<br>> probably
>>>using<br>> more sensible rules like GURPS or even, for a really<br>
>>>> narrativist approach,<br>> HeroQuest).<br>><br>> The interesting
>>>spin is that the PCs will be made up of<br>> both NATO and<br>> Warsaw
>>>Pact members and will have a combined ideology :)<br>><br>> Plus something
>>>that's very special which both sides want to<br>
>>>> get their<br>> hands on....<br>><br>> Who's
>>>interested?<br><br>Me. Would prefer GURPS rules, however it may have to be one
>>>where we start with more than one character each, to cater for casualties...<br>
>>><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Churchofgaming
>>>mailing list<br><a
>>>href="mailto:Churchofgaming at rpgreview.net">Churchofgaming at rpgreview.net</a><br><a href="http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net"
>>>target="_blank">http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net</a><br>
>>><br><br>End of Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40, Issue
>>>6<br>*********************************************<br></blockquote>
>>><div> </div>
>>><div>
>>><div>OR</div>
>>><div>Anyone want to run an RPG Campaign</div>
>>><div> </div>
>>><div>Ladies and Gentlemen, </div>
>>><div> </div>
>>><div>Just wanted to confirm with everyone, if it is OK to start Dark Heresy on
>>><strong>Sunday 27th November</strong> (1 week following from the next Diaspora
>>>round). I have already recieved 3 expressions of interest (Mark, Jay &
>>>Michael), and am looking for at least 1 more. I dont want to ruin anyones grand
>>>plans or anything re: Twilight 2000 campaing, Battletech, etc....... </div>
>>>
>>><div> </div>
>>><div>Cheers </div>
>>><div> </div>
>>><div>Redmond</div></div></div><br>
>>> 
>>Care2 makes it easy for everyone to live a healthy, green lifestyle and impact the causes you care about most. Over 12 Million members! http://www.care2.com
>>
>>Feed a child by searching the web! Learn how http://www.care2.com/toolbar
>>_______________________________________________
>>Churchofgaming mailing list
>>Churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
>>http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20111114/e70f69aa/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Egrek TwoThousand <markllewellyn.acca at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Churchofgaming] Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6 (Dark Heresy late November)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Size: 28221
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20111114/e70f69aa/attachment.eml>