[Churchofgaming] Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6 (Dark Heresy late November)

[Redmond Hamlett]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <churchofgaming-request at rpgreview.net>wrote:

> Send Churchofgaming mailing list submissions to
>        churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        churchofgaming-request at rpgreview.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        churchofgaming-owner at rpgreview.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Churchofgaming digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Battletech today (Carl Brown)
>   2. Anarchy in Poland (was Re:  Battletech today) (lev at rpgreview.net)
>   3. Re: Anarchy in Poland (was Re:  Battletech today) (Michael Cole)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:25:48 -0800
> From: "Carl Brown" <catodon at whale-mail.com>
> To: <churchofgaming at rpgreview.net>
> Subject: [Churchofgaming] Battletech today
> Message-ID: <B754F4512C804B0D9C508E8A6192555D at mail2world.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Battletech today.
>
> 100tons each.
> 3 people
> 1430-1750 (200min therefore ~20min per turn)
> 10 turns of combat.
> Did not finish
> >From playing megamek (look it up) it think we need 13 turns to finish.
> Even starting promptly at 1400 would not be enough.
> Next time I suggest a 1400 start and 80 tons each
> or
> a 1430 start and 70 tons each
> OR
> Anyone want to run an RPG campaign?
>
> K
>
>
>
>
> <p><p>Care2 makes it easy for everyone to live a healthy, green lifestyle
> and impact the causes you care about most. Over 12 Million members!
> <a href="http://www.care2.com" target=_blank>http://www.care2.com</a><br
> /><br />
> Feed a child by searching the web! Learn how <a href="
> http://www.care2.com/toolbar" target=_blank>http://www.care2.com/toolbar
> <a>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20111113/66305c6f/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:25:10 +1100
> From: lev at rpgreview.net
> To: "Church of Gaming" <churchofgaming at rpgreview.net>
> Subject: [Churchofgaming] Anarchy in Poland (was Re:  Battletech
>        today)
> Message-ID:
>        <6d3fbfe66f4115de7dbeba717333b7d2.squirrel at webmail.rpgreview.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> > OR
> > Anyone want to run an RPG campaign?
>
> I have an itching to run a Twilight 2000 campaign (although probably using
> more sensible rules like GURPS or even, for a really narrativist approach,
> HeroQuest).
>
> The interesting spin is that the PCs will be made up of both NATO and
> Warsaw Pact members and will have a combined ideology :)
>
> Plus something that's very special which both sides want to get their
> hands on....
>
> Who's interested?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:56:43 -0800 (PST)
> From: Michael Cole <mcole222 at yahoo.com.au>
> To: Church of Gaming <churchofgaming at rpgreview.net>
> Subject: Re: [Churchofgaming] Anarchy in Poland (was Re:  Battletech
>        today)
> Message-ID:
>        <1321228603.93304.YahooMailClassic at web160301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 14/11/11, lev at rpgreview.net <lev at rpgreview.net> wrote:
>
> > From: lev at rpgreview.net <lev at rpgreview.net>
> > Subject: [Churchofgaming] Anarchy in Poland (was Re:  Battletech today)
> > To: "Church of Gaming" <churchofgaming at rpgreview.net>
> > Received: Monday, 14 November, 2011, 9:25 AM
> > > OR
> > > Anyone want to run an RPG campaign?
> >
> > I have an itching to run a Twilight 2000 campaign (although
> > probably using
> > more sensible rules like GURPS or even, for a really
> > narrativist approach,
> > HeroQuest).
> >
> > The interesting spin is that the PCs will be made up of
> > both NATO and
> > Warsaw Pact members and will have a combined ideology :)
> >
> > Plus something that's very special which both sides want to
> > get their
> > hands on....
> >
> > Who's interested?
>
> Me.  Would prefer GURPS rules, however it may have to be one where we
> start with more than one character each, to cater for casualties...
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Churchofgaming mailing list
> Churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
> http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net
>
>
> End of Churchofgaming Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6
> *********************************************
>

 OR
Anyone want to run an RPG Campaign

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Just wanted to confirm with everyone, if it is OK to start Dark Heresy
on *Sunday
27th November* (1 week following from the next Diaspora round).  I have
already recieved 3 expressions of interest (Mark, Jay & Michael), and am
looking for at least 1 more.  I dont want to ruin anyones grand plans or
anything re: Twilight 2000 campaing, Battletech, etc.......

Cheers

Redmond
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20111114/ce44dc31/attachment.htm>